Talk:Quincy Miller/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   A few points:

   When you first mention his sister's death, it might be good to explain briefly that she died in a car accident -- we don't learn what the deal was until the end of the article.

   I moved the sister's death entirely to the personal section rather than the high school basketball section.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

   In the fourth paragraph of "High school career," the word "guys" is kind of slang-y. I'd say "young men" or "players".

   Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Plenty of refs, but is the citation to Twitter appropriate?

   I have formatted the ref to formalize that these are the nicknames that he proclaims. Is that sufficient? Removable upon request.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

   Fine with me. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   No problems here.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Seems NPOV to me.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   None.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   None used, likely none available.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: