Talk:Quincy Miller

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Quincy Miller/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   A few points:

   When you first mention his sister's death, it might be good to explain briefly that she died in a car accident -- we don't learn what the deal was until the end of the article.

   I moved the sister's death entirely to the personal section rather than the high school basketball section.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

   In the fourth paragraph of "High school career," the word "guys" is kind of slang-y. I'd say "young men" or "players".

   Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Plenty of refs, but is the citation to Twitter appropriate?

   I have formatted the ref to formalize that these are the nicknames that he proclaims. Is that sufficient? Removable upon request.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

   Fine with me. --Coemgenus (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   No problems here.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Seems NPOV to me.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   None.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   None used, likely none available.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Quincy Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121205005419/http://www.nba.com/dleague/games/20121201/FWNIWA/gameinfo.html to http://www.nba.com/dleague/games/20121201/FWNIWA/gameinfo.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602194156/http://www.worldlingo.com/S5JZ3IUWwlQmjpEtbeOb42FobIqBnwG0O/translate to http://www.worldlingo.com/S5JZ3IUWwlQmjpEtbeOb42FobIqBnwG0O/translate

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)