Talk:Pontic–Caspian steppe

Eurasian vs. Euro-Asian

Unlike the Pontic-Caspian steppe article (to which Eurasian steppe redirects then directed), the Euro-Asian Steppe article has no clear map. Is the Pontic-Caspian steppe a sub-region of the larger Euro-Asian steppe? Why does Eurasian steppe re-direct to Pontic-Caspian rather than to Euro-Asian? Athænara ✉ 13:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I withdraw the question—someone has been messing about with article names and redirects, and this article (at the moment) has the map. — Athænara ✉ 03:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Pontic vs. Pontic-Caspian

On a similar note, should Pontic steppes redirect here, or is that a subregion of the Pontic-Caspian steppe? I'll leave it to those more knowledgeable and leave the Pontic steppes page alone for now. Whitejay²⁵¹ 17:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pontic–Caspian steppe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224111409/http://turkic-languages.scienceontheweb.net/Proto_Turkic_Urheimat.html to http://turkic-languages.scienceontheweb.net/Proto_Turkic_Urheimat.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Should "Proto-Indo-Europeans" be included under "Historical peoples and nations"?

I'm not sure if it should. Please let me know if you think so.--Thylacine24 (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Identification of proto-Indo-European peoples depends on correlating archaeological cultures with linguistically-reconstructed hypothetical languages. Some interesting conclusions can be arrived at using this method, but it's not the same as what "historically-attested" usually means (being mentioned in ancient inscriptions, etc). AnonMoos (talk) 06:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)