Talk:Pet humanization

Animals Low‑importance

Pet humanization is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

This Article reads like ChatGPT wrote it. edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please rewrite the article to sound significantly less artificial, thanks. Devann (talk) 11:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edited Anthrozoology section edit

Latest comment: 24 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Agree with Devann on the article's artificial tone. I edited the Anthrozoology section down, as it contributed almost no new information and was obviously generated via AI. I'm not sure the section is needed at all, but feel free to give input. Fluxjupyter (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. The beginning of the article with the "⁤It is important to note" fired off all alarm bells in my head. Putting the article through GPTZero shows 100% probability of AI generated content, but I'm not sure how reliable that tool is for content on wikipedia due to possible overfitting. Octopirate (talk) 00:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Biased to an anthropocentric reading edit

Latest comment: 3 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How much of this is due to generative AI or the intent of the original author I can't determine (the title comes from an consumer discretionary report by the Binghamton Investment Fund rather than an academic source) but the article is structured to reinforce the central claim of these pet owners anthropomorphizing their pets with virtually non-existent connection to the larger study of animal rights and ethics. It expects us to take that core tenet at face value without any criticism, downplays any valid judgement of animal cognition pet owners make without justification, and the further reading section treats the subject like a mental illness. It's my opinion that adding a "criticism" section, merging it with anthropomorphism or deleting it outright should be considered. 94.2.119.223 (talk) 23:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SurgeArrest: Was any part of this article written by generative AI? Jarble (talk) 15:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic