This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
A fact from Paul Gosar Twitter video incident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - The paragraph beginning "Republican House members refused to condemn the video" is word-for-word from this source, though the source in question hasn't been archived by the Wayback Machine, so I can't check who copied who.
Other problems: - A few minor things here: (1) "Ocasio Cortez" in the lead needs a hyphen; (2) Ted Lieu's tweet needs an end quote and a citation; (3) Refs 4 and 7 are not formatted correctly and have error messages; (3) "223-to-207 vote" works better as "223–207 vote" per MOS:ENBETWEEN and MOS:NUMNOTES; (4) Gosar quote in the lead should also be added to the body of the article
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Overall: Article is new and long enough. There is a potential copy-paste issue and some minor copyedits and cleanup to do, as well as some minor referencing fixes. No QPQ is required as the nominator has 0 DYK credits. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@PCN02WPS: Has the last sentence been sourced? Y Does it remain neutral? Y Has it been changed in order to avoid any copyright violations? Y Have the other minor problems been fixed? Y Cheers! Fakescientist8000 17:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for those changes, we are good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Fakescientist8000: I think the title of this article needs some modification: first, AOC's surname is "Ocasio-Cortez", not simply "Cortez"; and second, there should be an en dash between her surname and Gosar (MOS:ENBETWEEN). This however would produce the rather unwieldy "Gosar–Ocasio-Cortez". Would there be another way of titling this article? One suggestion is "Paul Gosar Twitter video incident" (omitting the year, which is standard if this is the only event fitting this description). What do you think? — RAVENPVFF·talk· 09:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Ravenpuff I think that your suggestion is incredibly helpful, and I will move this page in order to fix any issues regarding its title. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 10:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the last paragraph: Twitter, while placing a notice on the tweet stating that it violated the Twitter Rules, it would be in the best interest of the public for it to remain up." (solitary double-quotes sic) It seems like some material has been deleted from this sentence but, scanning article history, I don't see where this has happened or what the last part of the sentence is supposed to say. MartinPoulter (talk) 09:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
It might have been a direct quote, but had since paraphrased. End quote now removed. —Bagumba (talk) 11:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
- Last sentence of the article needs to be sourced.
Article is new and long enough. There is a potential copy-paste issue and some minor copyedits and cleanup to do, as well as some minor referencing fixes. No QPQ is required as the nominator has 0 DYK credits. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
