Talk:Palazzo Pamphilj
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the Papal States
editThis was in Rome. Rome was in the Papal States. It was established in the Papal States.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- It depends on whether one is adopting a view of where the place was or where the place is. Most modern sources address things related to where they are now. I.e., a book would be about buildings in Italy, not about buildings in the Papal States. If you really want the Papal States one, it could be in both as a compromise. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Palazzo Pamphilj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090514054813/http://www.ambasciatadelbrasile.it/por/palazzo_pamphilj.asp to http://www.ambasciatadelbrasile.it/por/palazzo_pamphilj.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090730211419/http://www.ambasciatadelbrasile.it/ita/visita_virtuale/visita_virtuale.asp to http://www.ambasciatadelbrasile.it/ita/visita_virtuale/visita_virtuale.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)