Talk:Operation Unified Protector

Command

We need to change the current chain of command to reflect the agreement of the Canadian to take command of NATO Forces in this mission. See main article dicussion of the Libya Conflict. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.140.94 (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Agree.Is it the Italian or Canadian?Other dictionaries are better (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Libyan navy

Doesn't Gadaffi have any ships? Also, and though it's a bit WP:FORUM, who the hell thought up this crummy name? Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 03:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC) Edit: Wait, he does if I remember correctly, but I am too lazy to find the sources. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie Say Shalom! 04:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

he has a few, but he's not allowed to go anywhere in them! Another question - If this operation is a naval blockade to prevent any arms being delivered - who is preventing them coming over the land borders, which are 3-4 times longer than the Libyan coastline? Is that (to be) another military operation, or part of this one? Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 14:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

What's code name for coordinated NATO mission?

...to be commanded by royal canadian air force lt gen Charles Bouchard?--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Operation Unified Protector, noclador (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

See NATO document on Operation Unified Protector. 75.47.131.253 (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

HMS Cumberland

I have removed the {{dubious}} tag and added another reference. MOD confirms that Cumberland is part of United Protector, not Ellamy. ShipFan (talk) 04:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

US participation

The US just have 1 frigate in this operation i heard they where still spending 4 million dollars a day participating in the Libying intervention with 50 planes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.21.210.12 (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110405/ap_on_re_us/us_libya_air_force —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.21.210.12 (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Barack obama's policy.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 08:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Operation Unified Protector Logo

I don't know if this logo is protected by copyright law, because it is from NATO, and I am unfamiliar with fair use law. Would it be OK to add in this logo? I received it through the NATO media updates. http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pictures/stock_2011/20110415_110415-logo-unified-protector.jpg I believe that it would enhance educational value. Acadamicnut (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Another British Warship

http://navynews.co.uk/archive/news/item/491 Phd8511 (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

UNSC Resolution 1970

Hi, it is just to say that Security Council res. 1970 was adopted on 26 february and not on the 17th.

cheers

Zupippu (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Unified Protector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110325141257/http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/03/24/libya-gadhafi-rebel-misrata.html to http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/03/24/libya-gadhafi-rebel-misrata.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Unified Protector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121019130612/http://www.aftonbladet.se/senastenytt/ttnyheter/inrikes/article12812778.ab to http://www.aftonbladet.se/senastenytt/ttnyheter/inrikes/article12812778.ab

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)