Talk:Nucleofuge

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 185.175.35.246 in topic Nucleofuge vs leaving group

"Nucleofuge" is not obsolete edit

I hate making flyby edits. "Nucleofuge" and "Electrofuge" appear in Anslyn & Dougherty. _Modern Physical Organic Chemistry_ 2006. University Science Books. pp 540, &al. I think this is recent enough and high profile enough to be 'current'. So, I thought I would modify that line. Please forgive me if it's retention is preferred. However, the page looks lonely, and I don't think there will be any objections. Gaedheal (talk) 00:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Typo or not? edit

Is 'fugetive' meant to be 'fugitive'? Or is it a source word for fuge from some other language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.136.22.230 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nucleofuge vs leaving group edit

To the best of my understanding, and according to this article, 'Nucleofuge' and 'Leaving group' are synonyms. Why do they have two separate articles? 185.175.35.246 (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply