This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Why is the sample monophonic? Wouldn't it be better to have a clip from an organum triplum or motet? —vivacissamamente 05:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes it's "polyphonic". I'm not sure how to upload stuff (or whether I might infringe copyright if I should). But if we want to build people up to Sederunt or Viderunt they should be able to hear a duplum to start with.
This seems wrong to me to have a monophonic recording as an illustration of Notre Dame school music. It's been almost two years since note was made of this; I'm going to try to hunt up an expert. Yopienso (talk) 07:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Five years now. It's quite ridiculous to have a monophonic piece of music illustrating the "Notre Dame school of polyphony"... Anyone? -- megA (talk) 22:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
