Talk:No Highs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from No Highs appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 October 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the album No Highs is a response to the "corporate" ambient music of streaming services?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/No Highs.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 1 year ago8 comments5 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 18:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the album No Highs is a response to the "corporate" ambient music of streaming services? Source: https://www.allmusic.com/album/no-highs-mw0003923785
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Decarbonization of shipping

Created by PerfectSoundWhatever (talk). Self-nominated at 03:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/No Highs; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - Source provided is to allmusic.com at WP:RSN it is contentious whether all music is in fact a reliable source. Please provide a different reliable source
Interesting:

QPQ: - Creator/nominator has 9 DYK credits and needs to provide QPQ for this nomination.
Overall: RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

This source should work. Will post QPQ by today. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 22:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@PerfectSoundWhatever: It's been over a week since the above comment. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 20:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, now done: Template:Did you know nominations/Decarbonization of shipping. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:27, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@PerfectSoundWhatever:

The new source to verify the hook is good. QPQ has been done. Needs second reviewer to verify that nomination is good. Break a leg.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 21:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

looks good to me. RoySmith (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic