Template:Did you know nominations/Decarbonization of shipping
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Decarbonization of shipping
- ... that ships are making the ocean acid? Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/02/22/1045301/decarbonizing-maritime-shipping/ "Maritime shipping accounts for about 3% of global carbon emissions ...... carbon emissions have a direct impact on raising the ocean’s acidity"
Created by LouiseNano (talk). Nominated by Chidgk1 (talk) at 06:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Decarbonization of shipping; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Inline citations are needed in the section: "Advances in ... based power has been to date" - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems: - Remove the WP:OVERCITE after "conferences"
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - I have 2 issues with this hook. Firstly, ships aren't making the ocean into acid, but more acidic. Secondly, the ships themselves aren't making oceans more acidic, it's the carbon emissions. I would reword this as "maritime shipping is helping to make the ocean more acidic?"
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Pinging @LouiseNano and Chidgk1: — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
@PerfectSoundWhatever: Hopefully I have dealt with cite issues above and thanks for hook suggestion - I tried to make it a bit shorter - how about
- ALT1: ... that shipping is making the ocean more acid? Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/02/22/1045301/decarbonizing-maritime-shipping/ "Maritime shipping accounts for about 3% of global carbon emissions ...... carbon emissions have a direct impact on raising the ocean’s acidity"
- Thanks, everything looks good except for the "acid" part of the hook. I would approve this hook. Is this OK?
- ALT2: ... that maritime shipping is making the ocean more acidic? Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/02/22/1045301/decarbonizing-maritime-shipping/ "Maritime shipping accounts for about 3% of global carbon emissions ...... carbon emissions have a direct impact on raising the ocean’s acidity"
- — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, everything looks good except for the "acid" part of the hook. I would approve this hook. Is this OK?
@PerfectSoundWhatever: I don't think we need the word "maritime", as it is not in the title of the article and almost all shipping acidifies the ocean not just maritime (your environmentally friendly cycle courier "delivers" your pizza they don't "ship" it). However ALT2 is fine by me, but as the nominator I am not allowed to tick it off. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- I understand what you're saying, but the hook should be true to the source. Saying "shipping" in general isn't what the source says. Argubaly, adding "maritime" makes the hook more interesting (shipping across the ocean affects the ocean itself!). Ticking
ALT2 only. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 17:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @PerfectSoundWhatever: Is there something else I need to do here please? Chidgk1 (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
