Talk:Nintendo DSi XL

Reason

I forgot the reason to revert the last users edit. It is not just a size change, it is a (2 if you live in Japen.) new console(s)! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DellTG5 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Why we should keep the DSi XL page. By:DellTG5

We should keep the Nintendo DSi XL page because it a new console know as the Nintendo DSi LL. In the US it will be called the Nintendo DSi XL. It is not just a sise change but a new Video Game system! Thank You. Please make the DSi XL page a real page :) DellTG5 (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

It is just an enlarged DSi. I say merge. There should be a DS article and DSi article. No need for additional article for each size variation. --Aizuku (talk) 12:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

If the DS Lite has a page for a smaller and brighter screen, why shouldn't the DSi XL have a different page for a bigger and brighter screen? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.98.209.117 (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't merge them, they may be the same yes, but let me remind you they are different, and doing so will mean 1 less page. --Recgameboy (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Support merge - the hardware differences between the DSi and the XL are basically the dimensions of the console. There's no technical advance or hardware revision. The software changes can be summed up in the same article as the other variants, and once the fancruft/extraneous info is taken out will only take up a paragraph or two. a_man_alone (talk) 08:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Oppose merge per reasons in AFD, it's notable enough to retain it's article. SNS (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

These fool's don't know that merging would just hurt these articles greatly.Railer-man (talk) 01:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

The article has already been merged. Nothing we can do now. Railer-man (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

No redirection to dsi

This is article should retain its position and needs to be removed from its redirection to Nintendo DSi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.178.183.137 (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Please Note

There has been a lot of speculation concerning the release date, as I have had to fix the date twice. Please refrain from taking wild guesses at the release date. And please name your source. It is ideal to wait for a date from Nintendo before posting anything concerning release times. Thanks, Soulsilver2010 (talk) 04:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Again

PLEASE check with Nintendo before stating ANYTHING the release date in North America. Once again, name your source and cite it. Soulsilver2010 (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

For the Third Time

Please, wait for Nintendo to put out a press release. And name the source. I am getting very tired of having to say this. Soulsilver2010 (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Chances are, the editors changing the release dates aren't looking at the talk page; not everyone does. It's nice to leave a comment for reference, then link to it in your edit summary when undoing an edit, or just leave a comment on the editor's talk page to get their attention. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 13:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)