Talk:Nightfreak and the Sons of Becker

Fair use rationale for Image:Nightfreak.jpg

Image:Nightfreak.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nightfreak and the Sons of Becker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wetrorave (talk · contribs) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Following my reviews of 1977 (Ash album) and Avalanche United, it's likely fine for me to review this. Wetrorave (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good, image has a proper rationale
• "the Coral released" > "the Coral, released"
• "writing Nightfreak and the Sons of Becker" > "writing the record"
• "for the Lightning Seeds. The Coral" > "for the Lightning Seeds; the Coral"

Background and recording

• "were subsequently certified" > "were certified" because 'subsequently' is redundant
• "A few weeks after" > "A month after" because the source says it was a month

Composition and lyrics

• "album,[10][9] with" - put the refs in order
• "and an organ heard" - remove the organ wikilink

Release

• Looks good

Reception

• Ref 26 is a page for reviews of Magic & Medicine, not of Nightfreak; here is the right link
• "process. wrote" > "process. He wrote"
• "or 'Pass It On'"," - replace the area in bold with Template:'"
• "The staff at Tiny Mix Tapes"> "A guest writer of Tiny Mix Tapes"

Track listing

• Good

Personnel

• Move the sentence to the beginning of the section

Charts

• Looks good

References

• Copyright violation score initally seems bad at 30% but it is mostly because of the album's title and songs so it should be ok
• Italicize the second "The Coral" on the title of refs 2 and 3
• Italicize the title of the album on ref 15
• Ref 17: "=BBC Music" > "BBC Music"
• Add |author=Guest writer on ref 30

External links

• Looks good

Overall

 On hold as of 7 July 2021:

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

You may oppose to any of the suggestions given here if you give a proper explanation. Wetrorave (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

@Wetrorave: Made the changes. Yeepsi (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Alright, I'll ✓ Pass this one as well. Wetrorave (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)