Talk:Nick Perri

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Sergecross73 in topic Deathdealer101's edits


File:Nickperi perriinkguitars 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Nickperi perriinkguitars 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


Deathdealer101's edits

edit

After researching and going through every source and piece of info I could find on this guy, I actually don't think this page is too far off. I removed a couple of statements that didn't have credible sources, and cleaned up some other factoids. I also agree with you all that "georgesummer" shouldn't monitor / edit this page anymore. Even if he is no longer working for the artist, he's still too close to be objective. Lastly, in response to the question proposed as to whether this guy should even have a page, I feel as though he should. There are many people on here with wiki pages that have done far less.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathdealer101 (talkcontribs) 23:34, 11 June 2012‎ (UTC)Reply

I've reverted your changes because you keep on removing templates without addressing the issues. For instance, you removed the "BLP unsourced section" tag, after you removed a sentence. That doesn't make any sense; no sources were added, so it's still an unsourced section. The tag needs to stay. Secondly, just because you removed some sentences, doesn't change the conflict of interest situation; the article is still largely written by that George Summer guy who clearly has a conflict of interest. Don't remove that tag.
Here's another example.
In the article, it says Later that year he started releasing instrumental singles under the moniker "Nick Perri Music",[citation needed].
You then changed it to: Later that year he started releasing instrumental singles.
Again, that's not handling things the right away. The correct thing to do would be to add a source, not remove half the information, and then remove the CN tag. It's still unsourced.
Ultimately, I'm not against all of your changes, but so many of them are done the wrong way, like the ones above, that it makes more sense to change it all back. I'd suggest, until you learn more of the policies of Wikipedia, that you make smaller, multiple edits, so all of your work doesn't get changed back due to just some mistakes. Sergecross73 msg me 10:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply