Talk:Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song)

Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song) is part of the Treat Myself series, a good topic. It is also part of the Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 18, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
June 18, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted
October 17, 2023	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Meghan Trainor Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meghan Trainor, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meghan Trainor on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Meghan TrainorWikipedia:WikiProject Meghan TrainorTemplate:WikiProject Meghan TrainorMeghan Trainor articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 14:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

Fine

Lead edit

lyrics about self assurance. → add to the compostion section, with a source
Critics were mostly positive of the song → see below + Music critics
calling it one of the best tracks on Treat Myself → says who?

Done

Background and composition edit

I will fix this, see if you are ok with the changes in the meantime.

Done

Critical reception edit

"Nice to Meet Ya" received mostly positive reviews from critics. → "Nice to Meet Ya" received mixed reviews from critics. Idolator, NME, The Arts Desk → positive; Pitchfork, PopMatters → negative

Done

Chart performance edit

It also gave Minaj...→ At that time, it also gave Minaj
It charted at number 88 → It peaked at number 88
and number 13 on the New Zealand Hot Singles chart → and number 13 on the New Zealand Hot Singles chart, an extension to the New Zealand Top 40 Singles Chart + wikilik fot the latter chart

Done

Background edit

Fine

Synopsis edit

Merge this section with the one below. Call it "Synopsis and recpetion", let the paragraphs as they are

Done

Reception edit

MTV not in italic

Done

Live performances edit

This needs to be merged into other section.

Done

Personnel edit

Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
Was this the order they have in the inlay notes? I doubt it
Composer is different from songwriter, let's stick to the latter

Done

Charts edit

Use Ireland3 for an automatic source

Done

Release history edit

The australia one doesn't give me a date
Align center the references

Done

References edit

radiodate.it → Radio Airplay SRL + language Italian
All Access Music Group, Idolator, Good Morning America and MTV → publisher
The Music Network → wikilink

Done

External links edit

Fine

Overall edit

You can now address the issues. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

MarioSoulTruthFan, I believe I have addressed everything. Reception and live performances aren't related sections though, so I am having trouble justifying merging them since it would confuse readers. I can picture live performances being merged with music videos and the whole section being titled 'Promotion', but then the cumulative section will probably become too big.--N Ø 08:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@MaranoFan: Do that instead, it's better. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Most good articles seem to omit songwriters from the personnel section, since they aren’t usually present in the studio. Should I include them there?—N Ø 18:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Of course you should most FA's have it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic