Talk:Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by MarioSoulTruthFan in topic GA Review
![]() | Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song) is part of the Treat Myself series, a good topic. It is also part of the Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nice to Meet Ya (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 14:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Infobox
edit- Fine
Lead
edit- lyrics about self assurance. → add to the compostion section, with a source
- Critics were mostly positive of the song → see below + Music critics
- calling it one of the best tracks on Treat Myself → says who?
Done
Background and composition
edit- I will fix this, see if you are ok with the changes in the meantime.
Done
Critical reception
edit- "Nice to Meet Ya" received mostly positive reviews from critics. → "Nice to Meet Ya" received mixed reviews from critics. Idolator, NME, The Arts Desk → positive; Pitchfork, PopMatters → negative
Done
Chart performance
edit- It also gave Minaj...→ At that time, it also gave Minaj
- It charted at number 88 → It peaked at number 88
- and number 13 on the New Zealand Hot Singles chart → and number 13 on the New Zealand Hot Singles chart, an extension to the New Zealand Top 40 Singles Chart + wikilik fot the latter chart
Done
Background
edit- Fine
Synopsis
edit- Merge this section with the one below. Call it "Synopsis and recpetion", let the paragraphs as they are
Done
Reception
edit- MTV not in italic
Done
Live performances
edit- This needs to be merged into other section.
Done
Personnel
edit- Use
{{spaced ndash}}
so there is the right space between credits and personnel - Was this the order they have in the inlay notes? I doubt it
- Composer is different from songwriter, let's stick to the latter
Done
Charts
edit- Use Ireland3 for an automatic source
Done
Release history
edit- The australia one doesn't give me a date
- Align center the references
Done
References
edit- radiodate.it → Radio Airplay SRL + language Italian
- All Access Music Group, Idolator, Good Morning America and MTV → publisher
- The Music Network → wikilink
Done
External links
edit- Fine
Overall
edit- You can now address the issues. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- MarioSoulTruthFan, I believe I have addressed everything. Reception and live performances aren't related sections though, so I am having trouble justifying merging them since it would confuse readers. I can picture live performances being merged with music videos and the whole section being titled 'Promotion', but then the cumulative section will probably become too big.--NØ 08:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: Do that instead, it's better. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Most good articles seem to omit songwriters from the personnel section, since they aren’t usually present in the studio. Should I include them there?—NØ 18:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Of course you should most FA's have it. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)