Talk:New York State Route 293/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

• Introduction The intro shouldn't contain any information that is not in the article itself. Also, the intro should be a summary of the entire article. There is no mention of history in the intro, and the intro mentions that trucks are resricted from traveling on Route 6 which is nowhere to be found in the main body.

1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

• The article mentions the fact that trucks are restricted from traveling on Route 6 without the necessary citation.

1. B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

3. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

4. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

6. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Article is on hold until issues can be addressed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 02:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Done. I couldn't find a source for the trucks thing.Mitchazenia :  Chat  Trained for the pen 10:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I found one for you, check out [1] look on Page 8. Meanwhile, article issues have been addressed, article passed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 15:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)