Talk:New York State Route 293

Latest comment: 15 years ago by ErgoSum88 in topic GA Review
Good articleNew York State Route 293 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 293/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  • Introduction The intro shouldn't contain any information that is not in the article itself. Also, the intro should be a summary of the entire article. There is no mention of history in the intro, and the intro mentions that trucks are resricted from traveling on Route 6 which is nowhere to be found in the main body.
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
  • The article mentions the fact that trucks are restricted from traveling on Route 6 without the necessary citation.
  1. B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  3. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  4. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  6. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Article is on hold until issues can be addressed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 02:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Done. I couldn't find a source for the trucks thing.Mitchazenia :  Chat  Trained for the pen 10:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I found one for you, check out [1] look on Page 8. Meanwhile, article issues have been addressed, article passed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 15:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply