Talk:New Dance Group

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 168.91.154.213 in topic Better Sources needed

Fair use rationale for Image:Ndg-logo-126pix.jpg edit

 

Image:Ndg-logo-126pix.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

May now be closed edit

Judging by the Yelp entry this group has now closed, which would explain why the former ext links are now invalid. Yelp does not look like a reliable reference but I have not yet found anything else to confirm this. --Mirokado (talk) 21:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Better Sources needed edit

Hi,

I'm currently doing some research for a project and just came across this page- I noticed that the first reference of the two from The London Independent is a dead link. This page could definitely benefit from finding some more sources to back up its information. Hopefully if I get some time soon I can start finding some things to work with. Anyway, just wanted to maybe bring it to light if anyone else was interested in editing.

Thanks!

Andy 168.91.154.213 (talk) 10:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply