Talk:Neoclassical liberalism

Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism Redirect

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bleeding_heart_libertarianism&redirect=no This should go to Neoclassical Liberalism, not Left-Libertarianism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.206.181.191 (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

NPOV

The term in question has been employed to convey a significantly distinct meaning, as attested by reliable sources such as SAGE Publications' 21st Century Political Science A Reference Handbook. Moreover, it is noteworthy that the article relies predominantly on primary sources for its supporting evidence.

There is no doubt that the article needs to be radically revised. 93.45.229.98 (talk) 07:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Synonomous with neoliberalism?

Several sources identify neoclassical liberalism as another word for neoliberalism. See the following:

• "Neoliberalism (sometimes called 'neoclassical liberalism') is widely seen as an updated version of classical liberalism..." – in Essentials of Political Ideas and Key Concepts in Politics and International Relations by Andrew Heywood.
• "Neo-liberalism, or neo-classical liberalism, espouses economic liberalism as a means of promoting economic development and securing political liberty." – in Reforming Justice by Livingston Armytage.
• Also here: Fifty Major Political Thinkers; An Introduction to International Relations Theory; Modern Political Ideologies; The Future of Religious Studies in India.

However, the following sources—both citing Michel Foucalt—use the terms relatedly but somewhat distinctly:

• "Three stages or types can be distinguished in the history of liberal governmentality: classical liberalism, neoclassical liberalism, and neoliberalism." – in Power and Influence of Economists (p. 80)
• Conservative Liberalism, Ordo-liberalism, and the State (p. 424).

I encourage other editors to take a look themselves and share their opinions. --Precision123 (talk) 15:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)