Talk:Neil Ritchie/GA1
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Pickersgill-Cunliffe in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 12:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly - if only he'd agreed to write memoirs! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Prelim edit
- No duplicated links
- Images correctly licensed
- Article is stable
- Earwig reports copyvio possible only because a blogspot yoinked the lede in 2021
Busy period of work coming up, I doubt I'll get to this until next week. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Lede and infobox edit
- I'm not sure whether world wars is the most appropriate link, as it actually discusses a wider variety of wars than the two obvious ones
Changed to "who served in the First and Second World Wars" Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- You don't need to provide the shortened VE Day in brackets, it's the only time in the article it's mentioned in this form
- "with the British Expeditionary Force"
- BGS acronym not needed in lede
- I know the first paragraph of the lede mentions it, but the third paragraph could briefly mention that Gazala is during his command of Eighth Army. Right now the unobservant reader might think he lost Gazala while BGS of II Corps
- "
theXII Corps" - "he commanded the Scottish Command" to avoid lots of command here, perhaps "he was given the Scottish Command"
- "He commanded
ofFar East Land Forces" - Did he definitely join the army in 1914? I think theoretically if he passed out in December he could have joined late in the previous year?
- His service number is not referenced or mentioned in main text
- Added. I find it service numbers useful, as the London Gazette can sometimes locate on service number when it cannot on name. Officers did not have service numbers during the First World War. Out article says that they were adopted in 1920, but I cannot find evidence that they were used before 1940. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Early life edit
- Having checked ODNB I think Essequibo (colony) is more appropriate than Essequibo River; the former was a county at the time of Ritchie's birth there.
- Link British Army on first mention
- What's a runner plantation?
- Do we know when they moved back to England? (or was it just Ritchie?)
- It was the custom at the time for parents stationed overseas to send children to boarding schools back in the UK because of high infant mortality from tropical diseases. The family did return to the UK, and Dugald MacDougall Ritchie died in London in 1923. [1] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
First World War edit
- "he passed out" > "Ritchie passed out"
- "26 September 1915" don't need to repeat the year
- "24 April 1916", "March 1917" ibid
- Is there a reason why Battle of Istabulat isn't in the infobox?
- Link Bombay
- "and
hewas promoted" - "7th Indian Division" is this the Meerut Division? Don't see a reason to change the name here
- Per previous cmts, don't think the acronym for MC is needed when it is not repeated anywhere in the text
Between the wars edit
- Move the link for major to first mention with Wavell
- Link companies
- Link regimental depot
- "Ritchie served under Wavell as a"?
- "26 August 1939" repeated year
Second World War edit
- "May 1940", "11 July 1940" repeated year
- "Shortly afterwards Ritchie was made BGS of Southern Command" I don't understand the timeline here; he's mentioned in dispatches on 26 July and then "shortly afterwards" becomes BGS under Brooke who leaves "in July 1940"? (also, repeated year here)
- I won't keep mentioning the repeated years now, but there's a lot of them that seem unnecessary
- A word or two to say that Ritchie stayed in England with the 51st throughout that period, as I assume he did?
- When does the change from GOC 51st to Wavell's DCGS occur?
- "of major-general had been made temporary"
- "when the battle was won" what battle? I'm assuming Crusader but this isn't made clear, and maybe a word or two on how he won, or what the goal was?
- Give a word or two to introduce who Corelli Barnett and Michael Carver are
- Tricky, as British English forbids the use of false titles. had a go at this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- I know it's a quote, but I don't think "General Sir Arthur Smith" ever made it past lieutenant general even on a temporary basis?
- "first line Territorial Army formation" you used "2nd Line" earlier so consistency with spelling/numbers and capitalisation would be good
- "a
ntemporary lieutenant-general" - I don't understand why the paragraph starting "James Cassels served..." is relevant to Ritchie's biography. For Cassels and Elliot articles, sure, but it isn't clear why this particular change in underlings is any more notable than all the other changes that I'm sure aren't mentioned
Post-war edit
- I'm assuming not much went on at Scottish Command, but I'd be interested to know what Far East Land Forces were getting up to post-war?
- Was he based in Washington from 1949 to his retirement, or did he finish that appointment earlier?
- Until his retirement. Clarified.
Dates of rank edit
References edit
- References look good apart from FamilySearch. This is not a reliable source.
@Hawkeye7: Hi, that's all I have for now. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Anything further? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Hawkeye7: Having made a couple of minor edits I'm passing this article as satisfying the GA criteria. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)