Talk:Mundigak

early history

The german Fischer Weltgeschichte, volume 17, on India says that the excavations at Mundigak showed the western extension of the Indus-Valley-Cultures (p.18). Though at the same time closer relations exist to the ancient Iran and perhaps further West. A continued settlement in the Indo-Iranian area from pre-historic times can be assumed due to neolithic findings. It follows from this that Indus-Valley-Cultures and Indo-Iranian cultures are the same, including neolithic and later levels of history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.98.14 (talk) 22:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Harappa Culture seeds in Mundigak?

The "Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology", which is cited three times in the article, states in its 70th page:

"There has been a tendency to see in any Chalcolithic or Bronze Age discoveries in Sind and further west the seeds of the Harappa culture with its urbanism--such as those at (...) Mundigak (s. -e. Afganistan) (...) there is very little Harappan at Mundigak (...) ".

My question being, is there enough evidence to claim that "Mundigak is recognized as a large prehistoric town belonging to transitional phase of Harappan development"?--Negrulio (talk) 00:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I clarified this matter. Y-barton (talk) 18:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mundigak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afghanan.net/afghanistan/prehistory.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afghanan.net/afghanistan/prehistory.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Links are fine. Y-barton (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)