Talk:Military ranks of the Colombian Armed Forces

Changes

Whoever made those changes really made the article look much worse. The full table was more consistent. Also, there is no need to add all those images of the Colombian Army ranks as they make it difficult for a reader to understand the difference. I suggest to reverse those changes. Thanks --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Camilo; well, the main reason was to be able to split the groups and reuse/transclude them at their independent pages as well. While I agree in that I wasn't convinced on using the multiple rows of insignias for EJC, I didnt want to lose the work another editor had made for those svgs in EJC & FAC, and the previous table looked somewhat unfinished. I'll give it a shot at 'prettyfying' it a little later on, and I'm sure we can work on something over the next few days that leaves us both satisfied. Feel free to follow up w me at my discussion page if you want to. Cheers! Iceman0108 (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

I would like to restore the Army section to a basic row with the basic military ranks. Any user not familiar with the concept of arms might be confused by the additional engineers or infantry insignias. I would recommend you to remove the additional insignias and leave just one row as it was in the original page and add them to the Colombian army article. Also, the transclusions should have the layout I originally created as it gives a very easy visual understanding of every branch (air force, army, etc). If you dont do it I will do it at some point when I have time. Thanks --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Military ranks of the Colombian Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724153456/http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley/2010/ley_1405_2010.html to http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley/2010/ley_1405_2010.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724153456/http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley/2010/ley_1405_2010.html to http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley/2010/ley_1405_2010.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)