Talk:Michael Erlewine

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Erlewine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with All Media Network

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Seems like whole group of articles strategically created on Wikipedia. All similar in nature. only notable part is TiVo Corporation. Light2021 (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose - Not a valid merge rationale. Sergecross73 msg me 01:57, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose merge. All Media Network is independently notable of Michael Erlewine per the sources I provided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Media Network‎.

    Here is a source that demonstrates Erlewine is no longer involved with All Media Network so it does not make sense to merge it into his article.

    Nosowitz, Dan (2015-01-30). "The Story of AllMusic, Which Predates the World Wide Web". Vice. Retrieved 2017-07-22.

    The article notes: "Today it is a backbone of the artistic internet. Every music critic and, I'd say, almost every music fan visits AllMusic regularly. Erlewine is no longer directly involved with AllMusic, the company having been sold a few times since the early 2000s."

    Cunard (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. Both subjects are notable, and each have sufficient material to merit freestanding articles. There is some overlapping history, but they are independent--I think readers are better served by keeping them separate. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Erlewine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply