Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by LOVI33 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey MaranoFan, I'll review this. LOVI33 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reviewing this article, LOVI33. Looking forward to it!--NØ 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lead edit

  • Sourced to Tidal now.
  • Is the 2014 recording year sourced?
  • Are you sure Soul should be included as a genre since it refers to solely to its references?
  • One of the critics stated it has a "modernized throwback soul sound".
  • Per Template:Infobox song, later releases should be included in the article, not infobox so remove Atlantic records.
  • Isn't this Puth's debut single? If so you should add something about that in the opening sentence.
  • Target music critics to Music journalism

Background and release edit

Composition edit

Critical reception edit

Chart performance edit

North America edit

  • Looks good!

Oceania and Europe edit

Music video edit

  • Looks Good!

Live performances edit

  • Looks Good!

Track listing edit

  • Looks Good!

Credits and personnel edit

Charts edit

  • Weekly charts says 2014–15 but wasn't it released in 2015?

Certifications edit

  • Looks Good!

Release history edit

  • Remove streaming, sources are from iTunes.

References edit

  • Make sure all of these are archived.
  • Copyvio score needs work at 43.2%. Fix your quoting from ref 3
  • Change publisher to BBC for ref 8
  • Remove target to Entertainment Weekly on ref 19
  • Ref 51 is missing a website or publisher.
  • Ref 56: "jeff" → "Jeff"

External links edit

  • Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold for now. This article was really well written. Good job! LOVI33 17:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • I've either done or responded to all of your comments.--NØ 03:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Great!  Pass. LOVI33 12:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.