Talk:Marcus Bastiaan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 49.177.138.206 in topic Bastiaan accused of undermining PM Turnbull

Lost citation

edit

Does anyone know if this citation in link attached below can recovered? It featured Bastiaan stating "I decided to get a few of my close mates involved, so 50 or 60 new Young Liberals later, we changed a few things in Brighton."--110.22.50.32 (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~ [[1]]Reply

As with a lot of other stuff you have added to the article, this strikes me as trivial, and much too detailed to include. Hence my suggestion of getting out and looking at some other articles to see what really is notable, and what isn't. HiLo48 (talk) 11:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well info that is sourced can be lost due to the source itself being lost that's all. I was wondering that is why I raised the matter but yeah not all stuff on the page has got sources like Bastiaan's victory over Kaye Farrow for Goldsein FEC being undone by Mantach, hopefully a article or book in future will help to verfiy what has and hasn't gone in the Victorian Liberals. --110.22.50.32 (talk) 12:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~Reply

Unexplained removal of information

edit

Information related to Bastiaan's support from his father for a antiques business has been removed for unexplained reasons even though the information is sourced.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 12:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~ It was also removed on another occasion with the reason being due to it being inaccurate according to the user who removed it.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 12:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~ Basically it appear that a certain user appears to have a Conflict of interest regarding the antiques the business that was sourced.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 11:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~Reply

Some tips. Please go away from Liberal Party related articles for a while. Look at and maybe edit some other article. You will hopefully learn a bit more about what should be and what shouldn't be in articles. Read WP:INDENT. The content mysteriously removed is in in the article now, so stop. HiLo48 (talk) 11:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi I acknowledge what you say about things like WP:INDENT but yeah I am no saint but perhaps indicate what should and should not be in Wikipedia articles to Wikifriend1000 and 161.43.216.34. On anyhand Hilo48 I will consider the advice you have given me tonight.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--110.22.50.32 (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bastiaan accused of undermining PM Turnbull

edit

Bastiaan was thought to be undermining Malcolm Turnbull who today did not contest the ballot that resulted in Scott Morrison replacing him as PM. Turnbull got overthrown today after getting the conservatives off side including Tony Abbott who Bastiaan has been a supporter of. [[2]] --110.22.50.32 (talk) 04:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~Reply

This was in 2017 that the undermining was thought to be taking place long before the Dutton challenge stuff started happening.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 04:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~ Turnbull is no longer Prime Minister as of today, Scott Morrison is now in. --110.22.50.32 (talk) 11:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~Reply

You would need some very clear evidence that Bastiaan was involved in this for it to appear in his article. HiLo48 (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

True although Bastiaan was thought to be undermining Turnbull that does not mean he had anything to do with the overthrowing of Turnbull this week by Dutton and Abbott.--110.22.50.32 (talk) 06:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~Reply

It is alright Bastiaan's speech is mentioned from this source? [[3]] --110.22.50.32 (talk) 06:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)110.22.50.32--~~Reply

If it's relevant. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Months ago this article the way it was written was a bit of ABC version of the article it talked about was why Bastiaan seemingly was a bad bloke in some people's mind now it looks better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.177.138.206 (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply