2018 September edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent BLP vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 09:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

110.22.50.32 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I plead guilty to my edits tonight though some of the edits I was making intending to be constructive like the ones on Michael Kroger Drover i feel has bullied me he claims people like Bastiaan and Okotel are my factional enemies I am not a member of the Liberal party I do not work with those people. I apologize for my silly edits tonight I do feel though I was persecuted by one editor tonight becuse they just felt like getting me. 110.22.50.32 (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

So you brought your real-world disputes to Wikipedia and decided to vandalize articles of people you don't like, and the editor(s) who stopped you were "persecuting" you. With that mindset I think it's better for the project if you remain blocked. Huon (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.