Talk:Manny Get Your Gun

Manny Get Your Gun has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 13, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Manny Get Your Gun/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 01:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Prose style is ok, but there are a few niggles though. " This episode of Modern Family was filmed on October 20, October 21, October 27, 2010" should just read "the episode", and include an "and". "The episode was originally titled "Dash, Flash, Crash" in original press release," should have an article attached to 'original' - "an original" or "the original", either works. I'd give it a combing through for things like that. MOS is grand.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Citations are grand, no problem here.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Scope is good, not too broad and not too narrow.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Neutrality seems fine.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
History is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Sole image used is fine. However, article is missing a lead image. Can we get a screenshot of the episode, low-quality for fair use?
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Going to put this on hold until the prose has had a copy-edit (nothing major, just iron out the creases). I'd also like to see a lead image added. Neither alone is a huge problem but if they're both needing attention then I'd like to see one or both of them addressed before passing it.

I don't quite understand how to get a lead image, but other than that everything seems in orderNoD'ohnuts (talk) 04:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)NoD'ohnutsReply

If you have the DVD, a low-quality screenshot (no bigger than 300px either dimension, so take one and shrink it down in MS Paint or Photoshop or whatever you use), is all that's needed. A prominent scene or the title card, etc. If you can't take one, that's okay, I'll pass it without one if it's difficult to get one. GRAPPLE X 17:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I can't take one, I also don't have a dvd of this NoD'ohnuts (talk) 00:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, not a huge loss. I'll pass the article without one then, since everything else was addressed. GRAPPLE X 00:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manny Get Your Gun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101119145906/http://abc.go.com/shows/modern-family/episode-detail/manny-get-your-gun/609574 to http://abc.go.com/shows/modern-family/episode-detail/manny-get-your-gun/609574

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Manny Get Your Gun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic