Talk:Mad Love (JoJo album)

Contested deletion

"This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because..." it should be a redirect until it can have substantive content added to it. JoJo's two other albums have articles, and I'm sure somebody will come along and add content that passes WP:NALBUM when it charts. It was blanked by an IP address after Livelikemusic (talk · contribs) redirected it; that's the only reason it was blank. --Ss112 11:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

But is it notable? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Why are you responding to this? This is over a month old. This is when the article actually had a speedy deletion tag on it when it was merely a redirect. Ss112 07:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 16 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

---

Mad Love. (JoJo album) → Mad Love (JoJo album) – Per MOS:TM; see Fun (band) and Lovestrong (album) for further example. livelikemusic talk! 23:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

• Support per nom. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support. I had no say in moving it from Mad Love to Mad Love. with the full stop. I think people are taking the stylisation (as with every track apparently having a period at the end) a bit too seriously in this instance. Ss112 07:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support more normal styling. Dicklyon (talk) 00:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support I agree, it should be Mad Love and in the description it should say Mad Love stylized as Mad Love. (User:KieranWard94) 19:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC +0) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KieranWard94 (talk • contribs)
• Support I agreed with Livelikemusic's reason. Musicedit98 (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support. The punctuation is excessive adherence to main title header stylization. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support move for the reasons stated above. See also "I Knew You Were Trouble" for another instance. I do think we should include (stylized as Mad Love.) in the lead. Note as well that all song titles are also stylized with the period, but "Fuck Apologies" doesn't include it in the article title. Songsteel (talk) 06:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
• Support: There seems to be strong agreement on Wikipedia to avoid stylings with full stops, especially terminating full stops, as in the "skate." example of MOS:TM, and prior discussions for Anderson Paak, Bakuman, Fun (band), India Arie, Janet (album), Melody (Japanese singer), Shakira (album), The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard, Moon (visual novel), Kobato, and Gangsta (manga). —BarrelProof (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mad Love (JoJo album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121226171348/http://www.theinsider.com/tunes/45258_Jojo_Talks_New_Music/index.html to http://www.theinsider.com/tunes/45258_Jojo_Talks_New_Music/index.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.idolator.com/7645304/jojo-new-album-mad-love-cover

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)