This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The subject is a royal by accurate definition. Please leave the info box as it is unless you have some argument against the belief that the subject was not royal and does not need the use of the royal infobox.--Mark Miller (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've changed it back. Her royal descent is disputed since the title princess is only an honorific commonly used by people to refer to her royal descent and is not an official title. Infobox person can be used for royals too; I've seen a few cases, although none come to mind right now. Jonah Kuhio's article doesn't use infobox royal even though he was an official prince of the Kalakaua dynasty nor does her mother's because they were better known for their political careers than their roles as royals. The royal infobox is only used when you want to show titles and ruling dates and when the person in question is actually a royal. Using infobox person stays neutral on the issue and shortens the space the infobox take in this article. It is also being used in all the articles of Hawaiian royals born post-1893 including all her other Kawananakoa relations. If you disagree, revert if you must.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
I won't revert, but I do question disputing the use of an infobox for royal on all articles or subjects born after 1893.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
