Talk:List of kingdoms and royal dynasties

British or english

In this it states about the British glorious revelution in 1688, yet the designation british does not come in until the act of union 1707. Am i mistaken or should it be English instead of british? soory if im wrong

versus Royalist

User:Stijn Calle has changed both Royalist and Monarchism to record his opinion that the two concepts are different. I do not think these are minor edits. --RichardVeryard 19:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

small>

National Movement Simeon the Second, Bulgaria

The party has changed it's name and is no longer named after the monarch, and even in it's founding was not a monarchist party. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.230.15.145 (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

List dispute

This is getting out of hand. Links are being added by User:Gylatshalit that aren't even remotely organizations. I'm tagging accordingly. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:56, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Agree. --ssr (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

What is the reason that User:Gylatshalit gives for moving this page from "Monarchism" to "List of monarchist organizations"? I really don't see the point of deleting the introduction at all and this is supposed to be an article about monarchism not just an incomplete list of organizations. Some of the major changes made by User:Gylatshalit should be reverted. 76.88.39.179 (talk) 05:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

There used to be an article on Wikipedia about monarchism as a political philosophy, but now no more. User:Gylatshalit got rid of the article and redirected attempts to reach it to this list instead. The monarchism article certainly had developed too long a list, but surely it should have been forked from this point rather than removed entirely. I'm going to attempt a fork. Lereman (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Here's my attempt to restore the other fork: Monarchism Lereman (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I really don't see the purpose of this article at all. What is User:Gylatshalit trying to accomplish here? It should be nominated for deletion.76.88.39.179 (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

I just removed a ton of links from this article. This is a worthy project for someone more knowledgeable than I, but right now it lacks any sort of guiding purpose or philosophy. Some of the non-external links I removed were just articles about branches of a nations military! How does Saudi Arabian National Guard belong on a list of kingdoms and royal dynasties? I made a passing effort to track down a few replacement links if it looked like a subsection needed them, but clearly a more selective editorial process is warranted. Grayfell (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Political parties are neither kingdoms, nor royal dynasties.

Perhaps because List of monarchist organizations, kingdoms and royal dynasties redirects here, the article was peppered with occasional links to monarchist political parties. These might belong in a list of their own, or maybe in a distinct subsection of this article. (I'm guessing it would be redundant with Category:Monarchist parties.) I removed them, because having them interspersed throughout this article seems needlessly confusing, at least to me. Grayfell (talk) 08:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of kingdoms and royal dynasties. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113132535/http://www.royalfamily.org/press/press-det/press-3.htm to http://www.royalfamily.org/press/press-det/press-3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Maybe merge or redirect to List of dynasties?

Hello everyone, I was wondering, but wouldn't it be best to either merge or redirect this page to List of dynasties article? Since it looks much more organized and focuses on the same idea as this page. Plus the only problem on the other article is that it's incomplete. Thanks, JayzBox (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Help

Someone did a silent brotherhood think and removed the entire Algeria section, which I spent a few hours updating to get other kingdoms and dynasties in the list. Could someone please add it back, thanks Josh cant edit at all (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)