Talk:List of Amiga games

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 2fort5r in topic navigation problem

Common Names edit

I'm not a fan of preemptive- or over-disambiguation (esp. since games typically get the shaft), but editors to this page need to keep an eye on link destinations for common names. It's pretty obvious that pages like Stalingrad, St. Thomas, and Manchester United won't be about computer games. --Mrwojo 16:53, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Waaait, wait, wait, wait, etc. Freespace - The Great War an Amiga game? This seems about as probable as running Final Fantasy games on an Intellivision. --Kizor 11:39, 20 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

apparently so, http://www.amigaflame.com/amidem36.htm --Imran 00:08, 21 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
*Blink* *Blink* Okay then. You, sir, have just blown my mind. Apparently they haven't stopped improving the Amiga just because of a small thing like the end of Commodore. --Kizor 12:45, 21 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
I've just come across this page for just such a reason. I've removed the link concerned, but the over-linking, mis-linking, and reddlinking on this page is absurd. Simply removing them all would probably be a pretty good start. Alai 03:53, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I'm working on it. Punkmorten 18:47, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've just realised this article was originally copied from the Amiga Games Database and then converted into a Wikipedia list. How do I know that? Because I spotted no less than three PD/Shareware games that I've reviewed myself on AGDB, but I don't think many other people have ever heard of. JIP | Talk 04:57, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Category:Amiga games edit

It would be really nice if someone pruned this list with Category:Amiga games. Punkmorten 19:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • This is how the progress is going: # A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
    • Done. Erroneous links should be a problem no more. Punkmorten 10:43, 19 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Article is too long edit

This article is currently 65 kilobytes long. I'm thinking of splitting it into three separate articles:

Opinions? JIP | Talk 17:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Seems like the sensible thing to do, go for it. —Pixel8 18:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

CDTV and CD32 games edit

Just one question: Are CDTV and CD32 games included in this list? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.184.70.203 (talk) 18:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

navigation problem edit

When I'm clicking e.g. on "contents" > "Z" when I'm on site "List of Amiga games: A-H" (or I-O) it does not work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.184.70.203 (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

uh why is this separated? --89.180.38.217 21:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed this by replacing the tables. I've also moved the "Sources" links to the top page so they don't get repeated 3 times. 2fort5r (talk) 19:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

There was only one game beginning with a punctuation mark, 'Nam. I've moved it to the N category and replaced the !-9 category with 0-9. 2fort5r (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Table of content is not visible on en.m.wikipedia.org edit

I cannot see the table of content in Safari on my Ipad on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Amiga_games. If I force the browser to use desktop version, the table of content is visible.