Talk:Lena Dunham/Archives/2017/May
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lena Dunham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150215095534/http://gawker.com/5991066/how-david-carr-became-the-daddy-of-girls to http://gawker.com/5991066/how-david-carr-became-the-daddy-of-girls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160419143831/http://gawker.com/5903468/a-girls-writers-ironic-racism-and-other-white-people-problems to http://gawker.com/5903468/a-girls-writers-ironic-racism-and-other-white-people-problems
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
'sans' Photoshop?
'On January 3, 2017, she praised Glamour for featuring her with bare legs on their February 2017 cover - sans Photoshop - meaning that her cellulite on her thighs is visible'
I think the phrase you're looking for is 'without the use of' instead of 'sans', which is pretentious and silly. Can someone fix? --82.1.56.56 (talk) 17:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I don't think using "sans" in place of four words and something like 18 total characters when it literally means "without" is pretentious and silly at all. In fact, I think a suggested edit replacing sans WITH "without the use of" would be a better example of pretentious and silly editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.100.60 (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)