Talk:Lard of the Dance

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleLard of the Dance has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starLard of the Dance is part of the The Simpsons (season 10) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 25, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

A bit of info for the episode edit

I found this about why it aired during the Summer:

"This early premiere date is likely to have two positive effects for viewers. First, it will give them a chance to quickly reject the mediocre sitcom "Holding the Baby," which makes its debut at 6:30 p.m. Sunday (on WRSP Channel 55). Second, it will allow "That '70s Show," whose first two episodes hint strongly that it is the best new comedy of the season, to gather a following several weeks before the other networks unveil their new offerings. "That '70s Show" has inherited the post-"Simpsons" time slot at 7:30 p.m. Sundays.

Before delving into the content of the two new Sunday night shows, a word about Fox's Sunday-night strategy: The network in 1994 grabbed the National Football League away from CBS and ever since then has made an annual ritual of unveiling new shows that, it says, will become huge hits based on the strong "lead-in" audience from football. "

"FOX OFFERS BOTH GOOD AND BAD", State Journal-Register, The (Springfield, IL) - August 20, 1998

Hope that helps. -- Scorpion0422 22:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll try and find some ratings info too. -- Scorpion0422 22:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Successful good article nomination edit

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of March 24, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Appears to be, though I made one minor change myself.
2. Factually accurate?: Fully referenced throughout the article
3. Broad in coverage?: Appears to cover all aspects.
4. Neutral point of view?: No sign of POV.
5. Article stability? No sign of edit wars
6. Images?: OK. I would recommend using {{Non-free use rationale}}. I would possibly consider getting an image of better quality as this one appears to be a bit blurred.

I noticed that the image does not have fair use rationale for List of Springfield Elementary School students. You may want to add it. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— ISD (talk) 07:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lard of the Dance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply