Talk:Lapu-Lapu City

Fair use rationale for Image:Lapu-lapu City logo.png

Image:Lapu-lapu City logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

bati ang lapu-lapu kay gamay kaau dn halus wala nay tanum.huhu.T_T —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.74.142 (talk) 12:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

<Cityname> <City>

There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities. For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented. Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion. If you wish to participate, please post your comments here. --JinJian (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lapu-Lapu, Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110808042730/http://www.lapulapucity.gov.ph/about-lapu-lapu-city to http://www.lapulapucity.gov.ph/about-lapu-lapu-city

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Lapu-Lapu.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• BacolodNightAerial.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 10 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

---

Lapu-Lapu, Philippines → Lapu-Lapu City – Per new consensus at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive47#Moving forward on barangays plus some MOSPHIL discussion and the updated WP:MOSPHIL, regarding the simplification of title convention of Philippine cities into three types (<plain name> like Malolos, <usual disambiguation> like San Carlos, Negros Occidental, and <City suffix format> like Davao City), and abandoning the "x, Philippines" format, which is not a common name in most reliable sources and unnatural with respect to common usage here.

For the case of Lapu-Lapu City, plain name does not fit because "Lapu-Lapu" refers to the hero (hence it redirects to Lapulapu). It can also be a common name here in Luzon for a kind of fish. That's why the best article title goes to Lapu-Lapu City. Lapu-Lapu (city) is not natural. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

• Support as per nom. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
• "Lapu-Lapu (city)" is fine. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
• Support since Lapu-Lapu is not a common place name in the Philippines. RPC7778 (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Mandurriao Skyline.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)