Accuracy and decimals!? edit
Whats with 148,939,063.133 km² !? No calculation can be that accurate down to 0.133 km² what bull!
Is it probably accurate to at most km², 10s of km² or more likely 100's or 1000's of km².
No citation either!?
I suggest rounding it to 148,939,000 km² given global warming, ice sheet melting (more that 63km² would have been lost when that big chunk of the West Antartic ice shelf spilt off and melted lately and giving rising sea levels and shrinking land mass therefrom thee figure can only go down!? Any takers, any arguments!? Mattjs 07:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've made it a redirect. -- Scientizzle 07:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- SURE! BUT WHERE DID THE FIGURE GO NOW BECAUSE THAT WAS WHAT I CAME HERE LOOKING FOR!!!??? DESPITE ITS IN(I.E. OVER)ACCURACY IT WAS STILL USEFUL! Mattjs 08:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Here, check this. -- Scientizzle 08:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah like I said put a figure back in accurate to only 000's of km²! OK!? Mattjs 08:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Redirect edit
I reverted Scientizzle's redirect to landmass, because they are two different things. Land mass is an area of land's mass, whereas landmass is a landform. --AdamSommerton 12:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)