Talk:Lambeau Leap/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Lede

edit
  • "where a player" → "in which a player"
  • Spell out "Los Angeles Raiders"
  • Spell out and link [{National Football League]]
  • Per MOS:CAPTION, as a full sentence, that caption should end in a period

Background

edit
  • Just as in the lede, spell out "Los Angeles Raiders"
  • "4th quarter" → "fourth quarter" per MOS:ORDINAL
  • Comma after "tossed the ball to Butler"

Safety concerns

edit

Legacy

edit
  • "all Packers' players" → "all Packers players"
  • Same MOS:CAPTION comment as above

Notable leaps

edit

References

edit

General comments

edit
  • Images are properly licensed and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Copyvio score looks great!

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 17:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GhostRiver, I believe I have addressed all your comments here. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for making those changes, passing now! — GhostRiver 00:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply