Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Minor question: is the "goddes" mentioned in the Family and personal life section supposed to be "goddess?" Also, in the Conflict section, there's the word "rorting;" is that a typo as well (or just something I'm not familiar with)?
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    There's one line in the legacy section that needs a citation. I added a {{cn}} to point out where it is.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation):   b (all significant views):  
  • It is stable.
     
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    Images all look good.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:  
    Excellent work on this article, which is quite interesting to read. There's just a couple typos and the one missing footnote holding the article up from passing. I made a series of edits to the article, you might want to check and make sure everything is correct. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply