Talk:Kulveer Ranger

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 9 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kulveer Ranger, Baron Ranger of Northwood to Kulveer Ranger. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 9 May 2024 edit

Latest comment: 4 hours ago13 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 23:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kulveer Ranger, Baron Ranger of Northwood → Kulveer Ranger – WP:COMMONNAME. Ranger is almost exclusively referred to without the title, and WP:NCPEER explicitly states "peers who are almost exclusively known by their personal names" as an exception (although admittedly he hasn't got much media attention since the peerage). ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] Couruu (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pinging AviationEnzo as an interested editor (changed title to current) - please feel free to state your opinion below. Couruu (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Consensus view that this part of the thread went off topic Cambial — foliar❧ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please could you state whether this would apply to the article name only? I ask, because a user earlier today changed 'The Lord Houchen of High Leven' to 'Ben Houchen' in the 'Orders of precedence in the United Kingdom' section at the bottom of the 'Kulveer Ranger, Baron Ranger of Northwood' page, citing 'MOS:LINKCLARITY'. To me, it now looks as though Ben Houchen is a commoner, and directly follows 'Baron of Northwood' as this. I understand that using 'best known' names is standard policy, but surely this is context-dependent. A similar thing has occurred with 'The Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton' being altered to 'David Cameron' on 'Cabinet of the United Kingdom', even though his being a peer is the reason that he sits on that body. ZeroAlpha87 (talk) 17:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

No it isn't. He's in the cabinet because Sunak appointed him. If anything, Cameron is a peer because (Sunak decided that) he sits on that body, not vice versa. Cambial — foliar❧ 18:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I could have phrased that better. I meant that the peerage was granted, in effect, to enable him to have a seat in the Cabinet. Therefore, in a list with most entries' being Members of Parliament − that is, categorically not peers − reference to his having been ennobled would be useful, I should have thought. It is simply an alternative view; last time I checked, this was allowed. ZeroAlpha87 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Useful to what end? The point of WP:COMMONNAME is that people understand which individual (or other subject) is being referred to. "Lord Cameron of Chipping" is a name unrecognisable to all but some small fraction of our global readership. Those same readers will also not intuit from a name that this means he sits in a different chamber to others in the list. If you genuinely think that fact is important, add a note stating "sits as member of House of Lords" or similar. Including an unrecognisable name serves no purpose. Cambial — foliar❧ 20:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Cambial Yellowing, that is your opinion. It looks as though we shall just have to agree to disagree. It happens. ZeroAlpha87 (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Respectfully, I think that's a bit off topic! A redirect from "Baron Ranger of Northwood" would remain, so editors that wish to use the full title on other pages will be able to do so. My RM refers only to the title of this article, not its usage on other pages. Couruu (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, in retrospect, I agree. However, I wished to know what other people's interpretations of 'WP:COMMONNAME' were, as my understanding was, and remains, that it is a section of a policy on 'Article titles', meaning that it governs just those, and need not be applied to all links to main articles. Thank you for responding, in any case. ZeroAlpha87 (talk) 09:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support As peers primarily known by their personal names should use that in the article title, per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCPEER. AusLondonder (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom and WP:NCPEER. Well-known before being ennobled and title not needed for disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic

[1] ttps://www.gbnews.com/royal/king-charles-brits-opens-hearts

[2] ttps://reaction.life/on-the-couch-kulveer-ranger-lucy-beresford/

[3] ttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/jan/30/gb-news-criticised-confusing-two-sikh-politicians-social-media-post

[4] ttps://www.easterneye.biz/kulveer-singh-ranger-diversity-of-parliament-showcases-modernisation-of-british-politics/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]