Talk:Kim Dalton

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

New section

edit

I've removed the new section added by a new editor about ABC, program cuts, staff cuts, etc. It's a mess and has possible BLP issues. It was poorly drafted as it did not even tell the story chronologically. It uses some primary sources, it seems WP:COATRACK vis-a-vis the union, it's not clear how much of it should be attributed to Dalton and how much of it should be attributed to ABC or Scott. Some articles don't even mention Dalton. Finally, it's WP:UNDUE.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Noting WP:BLP as well here - and the reinsertion of material removed pursuant to BLP policy is improper without solid discussion here. Collect (talk) 04:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Dalton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply