Talk:Keepsake (video game)

Citation needed?

Did you bother to use Google? I think not!! [1] [2] [3] [4] Genjix

I don't think there is a citation needed for the first sentence but for this statement:

"This was verified by the developers examining the game and seeing the presence of several Crystal Space components. All attempts to contact the Keepsake developers by the Crystal Space developers for dialogue were ignored though"

I didn't found a reliable source for it. This sounds like the developers deny the use of the Crystal Space engine but in the interview [5] they confirm the use of it.

Contact the CS devs if you don't believe this!

--134.109.72.225 13:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

You want this in the article, YOU find reliable sources for it and bring them here. Wikipedia is no original research 134.109.72.218 11:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

This is not original research. I am in contact with the CS devs, and you can find on the Keepsake forum posts by Jorrit (head of CS) with no replies, they sent lots of emails to them. You're an idiot. Genjix 16:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I can not tolerate your insult. I have requested a warning for your behavior. A forum post and E-Mails are not a reliable source for Wikipedia. Furthermore what is your point? The game developers do not need a permission from the engine developers and they do not need to response as long as they do not change the source code. CS is LGPL. --134.109.240.58 17:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

If indeed there is a controversy over the usage of CS in this game, you can put it in the article as such, citing a reasonably reliable source. In this case, I think a post by a lead developer on a forum or a statement on the developer's website is reliable enough for this page, seeing as it's a primary source (as long as it was clear that it was in fact the developers making the post). However, simply saying, "I know these people" doesn't fly here on Wikipedia: you must cite sources. In addition, please refrain from calling users names in the future; we're not here for that and it only hurts your reputation. Illuminatedwax 19:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

But it is not clear that it was in fact the developers making the post in this forum and no response in a forum does not necessarily mean anything. There should be at least an official statement on the site of CS. --134.109.72.212 19:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Go to hell. [6] [7] Genjix 17:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

What does this prove? An unanswered forum post is absolute nothing uncommon and a posting with a request for technical feedback? Nobody has an duty to do so. Your repeated offenses do not help to solve this question and are quite uncivilized. --134.109.72.218 19:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

You're an absolute fool! I already said once, that all efforts where made to contact them (phone, forums, emails) for feedback but they totally ignored the CS developers. Why are you trying to hide this fact? The proof is there in asking the developers themselves. Genjix 14:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Then the developers of Crystal Space should make an official and direct statement on their site so that everyone can verify it. If you find such an statement you can put the information in the article. --134.109.217.37 08:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

This is true; if there is a controversy, there needs to be some kind of verifiable proof besides a year old forum post. The link to the forum post is inconclusive: it might not actually be one of the developers posting, and the game designers could have contacted the developers at a later date. The internal mailing list discussion is even less indicative: the conversation ends without them figuring out if they had gotten any feedback. In any case, the lack of specific feedback doesn't seem to be such a big deal anyway, and therefore probably doesn't belong on this page. Illuminatedwax 00:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I just went on the irc for #crystalspace and asked the developers. It is true. 85.58.67.65 14:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Your statement alone isn't a reliable source. It's rather a not proved original research. --134.109.124.202 19:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Keepsake Cover.jpg

Image:Keepsake Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keepsake (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070516112552/http://www.adventure-treff.de/artikel/interviews.php?id=29&lang=eng to http://www.adventure-treff.de/artikel/interviews.php?id=29&lang=eng

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)