Talk:Kalinago genocide of 1626

Latest comment: 15 hours ago by Iwaqarhashmi in topic Requested move 4 August 2024

Pro-European Bias

edit

This article is written purely from the perspective of European conquerors—indeed from the POV of one particular European—which serves the purpose of justifying their brutality. Caribbean history is bursting at the seams with tales that lionize the colonizers and/or demonize the native people. While the bias is mentioned as an afterthought, the majority of the article is very slanted. Needs more sources, and a more neutral tone. Nofux (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Genocide?/ Rename

edit

This wasn't a genocide, 2000 warriors were defeated in battle against British and French forces, sure it was a massacre but massacre does not always mean genocide. --$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 10:21, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 4 August 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (non-admin closure) Waqar💬 15:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Kalinago genocideKalinago genocide of 1626 – The current title fails WP:PRECISION. Multiple RS assert that the Kalinago were subjected to a much wider campaign of genocide throughout the 1600s and all across the Caribbean. See inter alia Honychurch's article The Kalinago Fight for Oüaladli and Oüahómoni, as well as Buser's "Colonial Injustices and the Law of State Responsibility" (in article). TRCRF22 (talk) 13:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Waqar💬 08:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

While I'm not opposed to such a move, may I suggest instead re-working the article to cover the Kalinago genocide more broadly, and have the current focused content collated into a subsection on Saint Kitts. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 22:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh, the broader genocide of the Kalinago definitely needs to be covered somewhere. I just feel that this slaughter is notable enough by itself to deserve a page, similar to how events such as the Slutsk affair or the Ba Chúc massacre are covered. TRCRF22 (talk) 13:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
From my search for sources some weeks ago, I had the impression that while it was covered, there wasn't a great amount of sources, so thought it may be better as a subsection in an article covering a broader topic. But I do not hold any strong opinion. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.