Talk:Judicial system of Turkey

Fair use rationale for Image:ConstitutionalCourtTurkeySeal.png

Image:ConstitutionalCourtTurkeySeal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

citation unreliable?

After quote 7 and 8 someone placed unreliable source with a question mark. Did s/he do it after looking at the sources or just because one source was presented as private (opinion)? I assume that Amnesty International's report was not considered to be unreliable. As far as the private source is concerned the report was written by an expert on Turkey, whose opinion is frequently asked in court cases in Germany. For people who understand German there are summary of a 300 page report and the possibility to download a 100-page report of this expert on the subject in question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sc.helm (talk • contribs) 15:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 26 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 17:42, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

---

Judicial system of Turkey → Judiciary of Turkey – reason Standardizing the name of main articles in Category:Judiciaries. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC) relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 13:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose ambiguous naming wikt:judiciary means the body of judges. While "judicial system" clearly refers to the judicial system and not the body of judges -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 12:03, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
• Support: its actually a rather logical move. "Judiciary" means the entire system, not just judges. Its more succinct and can be made uniform across other nation's judiciary pages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose as ambiguous, and as an attempt to force American English usage of the word "judiciary" onto the relevant articles. RGloucester — ☎ 15:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
• Support. It is not ambiguous, this is simply a more WP:CONCISE and WP:CONSISTENT (with other countries) way of saying the same thing. And where's the evidence that "judiciary" is an American term? The BBC uses it often enough.[1] Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 09:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Amakuru, this is exactly where the trouble comes in. Take a look at some of the articles you brought up. Look, for example, at this one, the first in the list. It says "Barrister and part-time judge Constance Briscoe, who was jailed for 16 months for lying to police, has been removed from the judiciary". In Commonwealth usage, "judiciary" usually refers to the body of judges, not to the judicial system. In this particular case, for example, that's what's meant. "Removed from the judiciary" means that the judge was stripped of her post as a judge. This usage does not really exist in American English, which is why it is somewhat of an ENGVAR issue, and also why said ambiguity exists. RGloucester — ☎ 14:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Judicial system of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070714114909/http://news.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGEUR440362005?open&of=ENG-345 to http://news.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGEUR440362005?open&of=ENG-345
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061005085413/http://www.byegm.gov.tr/REFERENCES/Structure.htm to http://www.byegm.gov.tr/REFERENCES/Structure.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070218011307/http://news.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGEUR440132006?open&of=ENG-TUR to http://news.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGEUR440132006?open&of=ENG-TUR
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501184618/http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/content/blogcategory/0/43/ to http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/content/blogcategory/0/43/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130328131257/http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/index2.php?pgid=4 to http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/index2.php?pgid=4
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814134032/http://www.hukukcu.com/bilimsel/kitaplar/turk_hukuk_sistemi.htm to http://www.hukukcu.com/bilimsel/kitaplar/turk_hukuk_sistemi.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.danistay.gov.tr/tarihce/baskanlar/huseyin_karakullukcu.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801031135/http://www.danistay.gov.tr/tarihce/bassavcilar/mevlut_cetinkaya.html to http://www.danistay.gov.tr/tarihce/bassavcilar/mevlut_cetinkaya.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-corruption-idUSBREA0F1CO20140116
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-corruption-idUSBREA0L1G220140122
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mystatesman.com/news/ap/international/turkish-president-says-hes-in-control-coup-falteri/nrzBT/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judicial system of Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928141102/http://www.inisiyatif.net/hukukmuzesi/hukukmuzesi/hm25.html to http://www.inisiyatif.net/hukukmuzesi/hukukmuzesi/hm25.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.interpol.int/public/Region/Europe/pjsystems/turkey.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Should the connection with international justice be added to this article?

For example Turkey relationship with ECHR and also UN stuff like https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/ccpr/2022-12-14/CCPR-C-162-AUV.pdf as Turkey has ratified the optional protocol I understand.

As I don't know much about law it would be great if someone who knows more could add it or explain why it should not be added here Chidgk1 (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)