Talk:Josh Bartelstein

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Gonzo fan2007 in topic GA Review

Mark_Titus#Club_Trillion

edit

I am not sure if Club Trillion is a term that I should use in this article. Is it a thing. Bartelstein had several club trill efforts if it is.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk15:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 06:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Josh Bartelstein; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Article looks alright. AGF on the source for hook ALT0; however, I'm getting a 404 for the ALT1 source – you probably will want to change that. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Josh Bartelstein/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 20:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Comments

edit
  • In the lead, He played college basketball for Michigan as a walk-on and a 3x Academic All-Big Ten honoree. missing "was" after "and"
  • Can you speak to his birth year/birth date? Where is the sourced?
  • The "Early life" section needs to be more focused. I would recommend creating a new "High school" section, but also tightening up details.
    • I know this was the DYK hook, but the whole paragraph starting with Because his father seems extraneous at best. This could probably be summed up to Because of the connections his father made, Bartelstein met many famous athletes and even worked out with Mo Williams, Bobby Simmons, and Kirk Hinrich.
    • Individual details of high school games just aren't relevant ("made a steal...")
    • Go through this section and really work to either combine sentences, remove superfluous details or summarize in a more succinct way. It really has too much detail.
  • The "College" section is also way too detailed. For a player who in four years only played a total of 56 minutes (like 1.5 total games in 4 years), this section should be a paragraph of two, tops.
    • The whole last half of the third paragraph has almost nothing to do with the topic of the article and just talks about the team. For someone who barely played on the team, this is excessive.
    • The article notes that even though he was "captain", the real leaders of the team were others. The whole fourth paragraph seems superfluous at best. Not sure the relevance, but even if you want to say he played with a number of NFL draftees, naming each one seems excessive, especially considering his limited role on the team.
  • The "See also" section isn't helpful and should be deleted.
  • In the "External links" section, "stats" should be capitalized in both bullets

TonyTheTiger, at this time I am leaning towards a fail due to 3B, namely that this article is excessively long and too detailed. However, I am happy to give you a few days to see if you can focus it up. Happy to come back and re-review after. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.