Talk:Islamic views on oral sex

Do not merged into Islamic views of oral sex

Do not merge.--Rana Ammar Mazhar (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Agree. LiteralKa (talk) 09:24, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Article is extensively sourced

Article is extensively sourced. Deletion should only take place after discussion at AFD. If some scholars disapprove, then the subject IS controversial, & so seems noteworthy.

Rana Ammar Mazhar 01:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

--61.5.138.29 18:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

• Keep

very important topic, if one can read Urdu & Arabic text in image. Thanks.

first check about the copyright status of the image, and then include a translation or, if too long, a link to a translation.

WTF?

Also, The existence of concept of oral sex is as old as Hudaibiya Treaty as is cited by the most precious Sahih books. At the time of Hudaibiyah treaty, Abu Bakr said to Urwa bin Masud Thaqafi as given below: Is this supposed to make any sense whatsoever?

Arabs Knows Oral Sex

Ammar 01:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

This shows that the arabs at the time of Prophet were familiar with the idea.

> Sorry but I think this subtitle is a little bit discriminatory... I don't know why we should assume that Arabs didn't know oral sex in the first place, it's not like if occidental people invented all sex practices or anything... that should be rewrited

Irrelevant

Why does it mention North American women and circumcision yet not talk at all about it in Islamic tradition?

This needs to be rewritten.

Work must be done

Have to say, this is a really great article, although it's a bit madcap. Let's work to tame it, format and style-wise. Pablosecca 11:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

This is not a great article. This is one of the worst articles I've read. It needs a complete rewrite to even come close to resembling most articles on Wikipedia. This article doesn't flow and just makes no sense at all to read. Timneu22 17:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

There's plenty of good material here, and lots of referances, the problem is the structure is absolutly awfull, it seriously needs a rewrite and a good structure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.89.173 (talk) 20:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

> Yeah, this article surely needs a lot of work and especially, the terminology should be explained or changed, cause the casual reader won't understand everything. For example: "The Shafie madhabs said that the sperm of the male is pure, but pre-ejaculate, or "mazi liquid", is najasa. The partners in fact might be licking the mazi liquid which is najasa before the ejaculation is completed. Hence it could be understood if this is the case then oral sex is makruh but certainly not haram because there is no evidence to say so." I have NO IDEA what this is about. What is najasa , makruh and haram? If you dont speak Arabic... you don't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.107.106 (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Clean-up

It seems that certain sections of this article would be good candidates for clean-up due to poor Wikipedia style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Kalivoda (talk • contribs) 21:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I just cleaned up a couple words to make it sound a little more professional changing permissible to acceptable

Cunnilingus

There's no specific mention of cunnilingus (man's mouth on woman's genital). Is this allowed or prohibited? Are there cases where only fellatio is allowed but cunnilingus is prohibited? -- ADTC ^{Talk Ctrb .} 10:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

These're all lies.

You have no proof from Qur'an or Sunnah that this is highly undesirable.

== Oral sex is Haram ==

Sahih Bukhari and sahih Muslim says sex should be through one opening. That's vagina. Oral sex and anal sex is prohibited.

Lucky Aquarius's view on Oral Sex

Islam is silent on Oral Stimulation. There can be two reasons in silence of Islam 1- If islam allow us then married couple would rely on Oral Sex instead of intetciurce. Which would stop the human generation. 2- If Islam forbade us then people would fo that act and later commit suicide in fear of Allah. Lucky Aquarius (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Lucky Aquarius Islam is clear that sex is allowed only through one opening that's vagina. Not mouth or anus.

Not only islam isn't clear about sex with the Prophet inviting his companions to let them do whatever they want on the bed, it is so on purpose. Islam has a pretty clear policy about non-mentioned things : they are halal unless specifically mentioned not to be so. The Companions themselves refrained from asking to many questions regarding specific elements in fear of being more things being explicitly forbidden (which is basically anal sex) -- just a guy passing by

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Islamic views on oral sex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415032643/http://www.islaam.net/main/display.php?id=391&category=134 to http://www.islaam.net/main/display.php?id=391&category=134
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120618122115/http://islamworld.net/resources/326 to http://islamworld.net/resources/326
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525070903/http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/004.sbt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/004.sbt.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513235949/http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/002.smt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/002.smt.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717080351/http://www.hebakotb.net/en/About to http://www.hebakotb.net/en/About
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003205543/http://www.daruliftaa.com/question.asp?txt_QuestionID=q-17060650 to http://www.daruliftaa.com/question.asp?txt_QuestionID=q-17060650

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)