Talk:Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,076 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
A user undoing my constructive edit and charging me for "possible vandalism" edit
@Ponyo:, @Sitush: Hi. I don't know what can I do as User:Airkeeper undid one of my edits and charged me of possible vandalism see here. In my edit summary I had clearly mentioned that I removed unsourced claims, see here, even then I was charged of "possible vandalism". What can I do to protest this charge? Regards Ind akash (talk) 07:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
As this user Ind Akash has been reported adding unsourced claims and was reported by an admin as editing that resembles possible vandalism here which prompted me to check him and he/she was adding words such as gifted, controlled areas instead of restored, parts of x to various articles disturbing the real meaning. Airkeeper (talk) 08:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
@Airkeeper: For your information, as far as I know, I haven't been reported by any admin for possible vandalism. Moreover, adding words like controlled or administered is considered WP:NPOV. If you have any content dispute with me, please consider dispute resolution using talk page. Thanks. Ind akash (talk) 07:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Where are the sources for your claim here and here?? You are also distorting the real meaning here.Airkeeper (talk) 08:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
@Airkeeper: Those edits, except this (as it is obvious that both parties were claiming those territories, otherwise there wouldn't have been a war), were made by a mistake some ten months ago when I had just started editing and wasn't aware of Wikipedia policies. My edits were reverted and I was warned by a Bot (not an admin), in that warning message I came to know about Wikipedia policies, see here. I realized my mistake and now try my best to make constructive edits and I have never been warned anytime after that. Just because I was warned in my early editing days, you should not have called my constructive edit "possible vandalism". Please try to assume WP:good faith. Thanks. Ind akash (talk) 08:26, 18 May 2017 (UTC)