Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...There are several in-depth articles about her in reliable secondary sources, including this Washington Post article [1], this Politico article [2], this Huffington Post article [3] and this Cosmopolitan article [4]. These sources all cover her in more than a trivial or passing way, and establish her notability as head of an influential women's rights organization. --Safehaven86 (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and I declined the speedy deletion nomination. However, the person could still nominated it for an WP:AFD discussion. I wouldn't recommend it, but they could if they wanted to. FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 14:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply