Talk:Hurricane Rafael

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleHurricane Rafael has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Article name edit

Since Sandy is at the main page because she is the only storm of her name, should Rafael be at the main page for that same reason? Rye998 (talk) 23:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be the only Rafael worldwide, so I'll file a request at WP:RM just after this post. (FWIW, Rafael is a masculine name.) --Dylan620 (I'm all ears) 02:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Actually, after taking a quick reread of the instructions at RM, I'll instead tag the intended target (Hurricane Rafael) for deletion under WP:CSD#G6. --Dylan620 (I'm all ears) 02:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nevermind, User:Hurricanehink took care of things before I could tag the original target. --Dylan620 (I'm all ears) 02:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The difference is that Sandy is almost certain to be retired, while Rafael won't be. CrazyC83 (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The same exact thing happened to Hurricane Rina (2011, which was not retired), and there was no consensus reached. I guess we will just have to move this article to Hurricane Rafael (2012) in six years (or whenever there is another Rafael – which could be a while)!   –– Anonymouse321 (talkcontribs) 04:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Being retired has little, if any, regards as to whether or not the article should be at the main page in the case of storms like this. Rafael isn't guranteed to be in use again until 2018, and even then, there is no gurantee that year will get to 18 named storms. Not every season gets that far, but the last 3 years were lucky enough to do so. In the unlikely event there is another Hurricane Rafael in the future (like if there is another Hurricane King in the future), then the article can be moved again. Rye998 (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
I totally agree – we should leave it how it is and change it if/when there is another Hurricane Rafael. –– Anonymouse321 (talkcontribs) 16:47, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Rafael/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) 21:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello TAWX14, I will be reviewing Rafael, under the condition that you do not yell. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 21:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Toolbox Checks edit

  • No issues reported. Good job! Though Peer Reviewer indicates you have only two images. Maybe you should try adding more. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • You should link tropical wave. Is it an oceanic wave? Link.
  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "...it skipped tropical depression status..." I'm fine with skipped, but it sort of sounds funny. If there's any alternative, then you can change it.
I think it's fine as is. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "...a subsequent decrease..." Decrease of what. And you should probably use 'a subsequent weakening...'
I already state what in the first part of the sentence. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "...to develop in earnest..." Not sure if that is a correct usage, is it?
Why wouldn't it be? TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "As much as a foot of rain fell..." Needs metric conversion.
Does it? I did not use an exact total, so I don't think so. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "...but overall, damage to both locations was minimal." Which two? I see four locations in the second paragraph. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Was speaking mainly about Newfoundland...  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Meteorological history edit

No. It's always a part of. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "As Rafael moved northward, it continued to intensify rapidly in spite of weak wind shear." Is the occurrence weak wind shear prohibitive to the intensification of tropical cyclones? A publication indicates low wind shear is necessary for rapid intensification anyways.
Should've been moderate. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Preparations and impact edit

Caribbean islands edit

  • Link watch and warning terms
K. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "By the morning hours of October 9, the warnings were discontinued for Saint Lucia and Martinique..." October 9 is before Rafael developed into a tropical storm. Did you mean that?
No. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
K. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
K. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "...most businesses closed..." → "...most businesses were closed...*
Yes. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "A few people attempted to drive through flooded roads and required rescue; however, there were no reports of injuries or fatalities." I thought the one fatality associated with Rafael was the result of an attempted drive-thru of a flooded road. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Err...right. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bermuda edit

  • "the main two airports on Bermuda—WestJet and United Airlines—cancelled hundreds of flights on October 16." Are those airports or airlines? TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Airlines. Fixed. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Newfoundland edit

Gotcha. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Since these were the only problems I identified, I will pass this GAN once you have fixed the aforementioned qualms. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 22:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Rafael. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Hurricane Rafael. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Hurricane Rafael. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply