Talk:Homoarginine
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2012. Further details are available here. |
School-project feedback: Group 14 edit
Review #1 All your sections are extremely thorough and coherent. The information you include is specific, yet it is easily understood by the reader.My only suggestion is to do in text citations. Also, do the N/As in your chembox signify values that you could not find? Or did it appear like that in one of your sources? Otherwise, the page looks near completion, good work!
React uiuc 2012 (talk) 17:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Review #2 The wiki page is off to a great start! The organization of the wiki page is what I would expect and the infomation about the compound seems to be organized well. The sentence structure seems to be very jagged. For example, it seems that the one sentence is from one source while the next is from another source. Try to combat this by saying "According to this article.... and the next. Otherwise some solid information; it just needs to be cited with references all throught the article. I would recomend keeping up with this becuase it makes it difficult to come up with what came from which article at the very end. I would also suggest that the group adds some infromation pertaining to the way that it it is used in laboratories and explicitly explain the functional groups and its effects for the molecule and reactions. Ajchancellor (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Andrew Chancellor
The Occurences portion was very informative and detailed. You included some interesting information, but I wasn't sure they were cited. Also, I noticed several typos: the second sentence should read "It is a growth..." The third sentence does not need the "as well" at the end, either- it is redundant to the earlier "also". The 5th sentence should read "In its inhibition..." instead, because "it's" is the conjugation of "it is".
The rest of your sections are really clear and put together very well. Your formatting also looks good. One more thing in the History section though- for clarification reasons, you may want to define "NO" the first time you mention it. Otherwise, looks great! Acruz10 (talk) 01:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)