Talk:Gender identity under Title IX

Proposed merge of Dallas School District locker room controversy into Gender identity under Title IX#Litigation

edit

Since the case is already settled and there is no scope for any expansion of the article's text, a selective merge (of relevant part or a summary) of Dallas School District locker room controversy to Litigation section on this page seems rational. - Harsh (talk) 08:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 07:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Review For Class Project

edit

I thought the lead section of the article was clear and easy to understand. It gave a good brief overview of the article. The structure of the article was clear and followed the timeline of events well. I think it could be broken down into another paragraph to avoid the large block of text, but it is not necessary. The content was unbiased and well written, although I think it could be condensed down some, the tone reads more like a story rather than an article. The sources were all refutable, quality sources but source 72, the Transgender Student article, is now unavailable.Mollie.Bach (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Religious exemption from Title IX: consequences for LGBT+ students

edit

Hey, I can't find any overview of how any religious school can be exempt from a Title IX provision, if the school is able to prove the provision conflicts with a specific tenet of their religious institution. This exemption deserves to be noted in this article, as it's allowed American higher education to discriminate against LGBTQ+ students while continuing to receive federal funding. I'm reading up on the issue and intend to edit this article to include it soon. EatDust?Pls (talk) 22:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply