Talk:Ganapathi Sachchidananda
Latest comment: 2 years ago by DaxServer in topic Massive puffery and promotion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ganapathi Sachchidananda article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Old Proposal edit
Swamiji's official name is Sri Ganapathy Sachchidananda Swamiji. I propose to rename the page to Sri Ganapathy Sachchidananda Swamiji.
This is an old proposal which I have moved here, but I am not the proposal editor.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
The article, I feel, does not follow the Wikipedia WP:NPOV standards. The theme of the article is laudatory. Which is why I initiate this discussion on its neutrality. I can make a detailed argument to defend my assertion if I receive response to this nomination. -SharadbobTalkC 17:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's definitely written from a fanboy perspective. I eliminated a lot of the puffery, honorifics, random capitalization, and the like, but many of the substantive claims have no reliable sourcing at all. PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Massive puffery and promotion edit
I trimmed all of the unsourced material, as this was one of the worst promotional articles I have ever seen. That meant a reduction of 40KB! From 50KB to 10KB.--- Possibly (talk) 07:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Possibly Thanks for the ce. -- DaxServer (talk) 09:00, 31 May 2021 (UTC)